Over at Marsha’s blog, Story Chat is a piece of prose written by a blogger, posted twice a month. Other writers are invited to comment about the story and give feedback. My story ‘Home Ship Home,’ was posted earlier this week and has received some very detailed and interesting analysis from the readers. So much so, that I have been moved to re-blog the post – something so unusual that it has only been done once or before – in fourteen years of blogging!
Opening Lines in Narratives
In particular, one blogger wrote that he liked my opening gambit – a line of dialogue aimed at grabbing the reader’s attention – in the middle of the action, rather than a lengthy setting description or back story. Goal achieved.
My topic was a difficult one. I wrote this as a tragedy not a suicide.
Some readers wondered about whether the protagonists’ relationship was romantic. It might have been, but their lifestyles and background were diametrically opposed. It is something I might need to clarify so that readers aren’t confused.
I also needed to expand on Manny’s backstory and his work history that revealed his impulsive nature. This suggestion was that the character saying that the job sucks was overblown. Fair point but did it communicate his un-employability? I was hoping his expectations of starting a company when he couldn’t hold down a unskilled job were also indicative of his exuberance and youthful impracticality.
Lost in Translation
Highlighting how stories can get lost in translations in other countries, languages or cultures, outside one’s social milieu, one blogger questioned the switch from full name to using a nickname for Manfred. We do that in Australia – all the time! Shortening one’s name is a way to show the other person affection, a closer friendship, or bonding. I am now mindful that a global audience has different interpretations and expectations in creative writing! Thank you!
There were plot junctures I found more difficult when I wrote and updated this story and it wasn’t lost by the Story Chat readers. When Holly is at home hearing the news report, one suggestion was that the news should have just taken Holly’s breath away with hopes that this wasn’t her friend who was involved. And another wrote that she could have a short conversation with herself about why she was so optimistic that it couldn’t be her friend.
These are excellent suggestions I will use!
I do agree I also conveyed a plot hole – getting the plotline to sit for a week and how Holly discovers Manfred was indeed the victim was tricky for me to plan. The police were in fact, no longer at the bridge, but their cordon was still in place on a section of rail, because police investigations take time to complete. Perhaps the time frame of a week wasn’t plausible?
How long would a police cordon of crime scene yellow tape stay in place? Only 24 hours, or a week?
And the torn cardboard with the ominous words – a clue left for the reader – might indeed have been snavelled as police evidence, or would it?
How would a random bit of cardboard be important in an accidental death? Only the reader and the main characters have any knowledge of its significance.
All the comments were very well appreciated and I will use them to improve the story. Were the quotes necessary and could the story stand alone without them?
Another excellent point I will take on board.
Happy Endings in Stories
As a tragedy along Freytag’s pyramid lines, this story doesn’t have a happy ending but the end quote sums up the lesson therein.
Various other commenters mentioned they prefer happy ending. That this might be an American preference. I am more realistic in my stories and I like to leave the reader with a message or something deeper to think about. In this case, treasure the present moments with friends.
Do you prefer happy endings to stories? Or realism?
The comments so generously shared contributed to a very big smile for me this week so I am including this in fellow story-writer and blogger Trent’s Weekly Smile. There you will find more than a few happy endings.